Services

CRO Agency for B2B Marketing Teams

Every point of conversion is money you already spent bringing the visit in. Conversion rate optimization finds where the site loses that visit, usually before the form, changes it on evidence, and follows the result through to qualified pipeline. Every change is recorded with what it did, so the same idea never gets paid for twice.

Book a Discovery Call
Evidence Before Opinion

Why Conversion Stays Flat While Traffic Grows

The ProblemStandard Agency

Pages change because someone senior prefers them

Pages change because someone senior prefers the new version. Nobody can say afterwards whether it helped, so the site becomes a record of who was in the room rather than what worked.

Leads are up and the conversion slide is flat

Traffic has grown for two quarters and conversion has not moved. That is the board slide nobody wants to present: plenty of activity, and no change in the number that pays for it.

Nobody checks whether the leads became pipeline

Conversion gets measured at the form and stops there. Nobody checks whether the extra leads became pipeline, so a change that doubled junk enquiries still reads as a success.

The SolutionThe Legency Approach

The first fix lands on the page costing the most

Analytics, session behaviour and the sales team point at where the site loses people. The backlog is ranked by the size of the leak, so the first test is on the page that costs the most.

Tests are sized to the traffic you actually have

Where the traffic supports a test we run one and wait for significance. Where it does not, we say so and change the page on research instead, then track the before and after honestly.

A result you can put in front of a board

Conversions are tracked through to qualified opportunities wherever your CRM allows it, so each change is reported as pipeline rather than form fills. A change that lifts submits and drops qualified leads is a loss, and it gets reported as one.

The Programme

What the Programme Puts in Your Hands

A Ranked List of Where Money Leaks

A full pass over the paths that matter: landing pages, the pricing page, the forms, the mobile experience and the speed budget. It ends in a ranked list of leaks with the traffic and the value behind each one.

A Test Queue That Keeps Moving

Hypotheses drawn from the audit, run in order of expected value. Each test states what it expects to move before it starts. Wins ship, losses get documented, and the log is yours to keep.

Campaign Pages Ready Inside the Window

Pages built as components in Webflow, so a new campaign page takes hours rather than a sprint and is live while the campaign still runs. Built to be tested: the parts most likely to change are the easiest to swap.

Conversions Followed Past the Form

Events, goals and CRM handoff wired so a conversion can be followed to a qualified opportunity. Without this the whole programme is guesswork dressed as data.

Before Anyone Sells You Testing

Most B2B Sites Lack the Traffic to Run a Test

An A/B test can only prove a change bigger than the noise in your own traffic. That threshold is arithmetic, and it is the first thing we work out, because a test called early ships the wrong page.

On a 2% conversion rate, a site with a thousand visits a month can only prove a change that more than doubles conversion. Nobody makes that change on purpose. A site with fifty thousand can prove an 18% lift, which is a realistic target.

Where the traffic is not there, we say so and change the page on research instead, then track the before and after honestly rather than calling it a test.

1,000 a month
+124%
5,000 a month
+55%
20,000 a month
+28%
50,000 a month
+18%
Smallest lift a one-month test could prove, at 95% confidence and 80% power, on a 2% baseline with traffic split evenly across two variants. Computed, not illustrative. Bars are the size of change required, so shorter is better.
Where B2B Sites Lose People

The Five Leaks We Find Most

These come up on nearly every audit. None of them is a design argument, and all of them are measurable before and after.

  1. 01

    The form asks for things sales never uses

    Company size, job title, phone number, "how did you hear about us". Each field costs completions. We check which of them the sales team has ever filtered on, and the ones nobody uses come off. This is usually the largest recoverable loss on a B2B site, and it costs nothing to fix.

  2. 02

    The page speaks to one person on a committee

    B2B buying runs through several people who are not the champion. The page answers the practitioner and says nothing to the person who has to sign, so the champion has nothing to forward. Pricing posture, security posture and implementation effort are the ones usually missing.

  3. 03

    Mobile is treated as a smaller desktop

    A third of B2B traffic reads on a phone even where nobody buys on one. Blueflame's mobile score went from 36 to 72 in a day, and that was a build problem rather than a design one.

  4. 04

    The proof is generic

    Four logos and a testimonial with no number in it. Proof has to be specific enough to be checkable, or the reader discounts all of it including the true parts.

  5. 05

    Nothing is tracked past the form

    Conversion is counted at submit and never followed. So a change that lifts form fills and fills the pipeline with junk reads as a win in every report, and the sales team quietly stops trusting marketing's numbers.

The Deliverable

The Test Log Is Yours to Keep

Every test is written down before it runs: the page, the hypothesis, what it expects to move, and how long it needs. Afterwards it gets a result, including the ones that lost.

The losses are the part that makes the log worth keeping. An agency that only records its wins hands the next agency a blank page, and your company pays to learn the same thing twice.

The log is yours. It stays useful after we are gone, and it is the record of what your own audience responds to.

TestExpectedResult
Cut form from 9 fields to 4+20% submitsShipped
Pricing posture above the fold+10% demo startsShipped
Video hero on the home page+15% engagementNo effect
Social proof bar under the CTA+8% submitsReverted

Shape of the log, not a client's results. Real test logs stay with the client.

Case StudyBlueflame AI

Paid search and landing pages tuned together for eighteen months.

We manage Blueflame's paid search and the pages those clicks land on, and have for over eighteen months. Campaign and landing page get tuned together, against the same conversion data, and organic search now brings more demo requests than paid.

View Case Study
A soft field of blue light rendered as a pixel dither, captioned Organic ahead of paid
Start With the Leaks

Find Out Where the Site Loses People

A call about your traffic and your forms, because those two decide whether testing is even possible. If the volume is not there yet we will say so, and tell you what is worth doing instead.

  • What your traffic can and cannot prove, before anything is promised
  • The leaks we find most often, and which ones apply to you
  • Conversions tracked past the form wherever your CRM allows it
Common Questions

Frequently Asked
Questions

It finds where a site loses people, using analytics, session recordings and the sales team rather than opinion. It tests changes against that evidence. Then it reports what each change did to pipeline, including the ones that failed. Anything that skips the first step is a redesign.

For testing specifically, more than most people are told. On a 2% conversion rate, a month of traffic split across two variants needs roughly 20,000 visits before a test can prove a 28% lift, and around 50,000 before it can prove an 18% one. At 1,000 visits a month the only change a test could prove is one that more than doubles conversion, which is not a change anyone makes deliberately. Below the threshold, CRO is still worth doing: the audit, the form work and the page rebuilds all pay, and we track them as before-and-after rather than pretending a test ran.

The audit produces fixable problems in the first fortnight, and the obvious ones ship straight away. A test needs two to six weeks to conclude depending on traffic. Compounding gains take a few months, because they come from a run of small wins rather than one redesign, and each one is on the monthly report the month it lands.

Only when the audit says the structure is the problem. A redesign resets everything you have learned and makes the result impossible to attribute, so it is the expensive answer. Most of the value sits in a handful of pages, and we would rather prove that first.

Landing page optimization is one part of it, and usually the part with the fastest return because campaign traffic is concentrated and high intent. CRO covers the whole path, including the pages someone visits after the landing page and before they convert.

Analytics access, CRM access if you want conversions tracked to pipeline, and about an hour a month. The reason we ask for sales input is that the sales team already knows which leads are junk, and that is the fastest route to the right test.